Defending Aggression: The David Kay Report
Posted: Friday, January 30, 2004

Is David Kay a weapon of mass deflection?
The latest spin surrounding the Bush adiministration's pre-war intelligence on Iraq comes from outgoing WMD hunter David Kay. After rummaging around Iraq for nine months and coming back empty-handed, Kay says he now believes that no such weapons exist, and haven't since the mid nineties. But instead of drawing the logical conclusion that he's been duped and played for a fool, he chose instead to launch the latest salvo in the Bush administration's undeclared war on the rank and file US intelligence community.

Americans deserve to know
Why did the Bush administration push WMDs as a justification for war? Congress should find out.

Defending Aggression: The David Kay Report

The Hutton Inquiry
Hutton a whitewash, say 56%
'The Public Must Look to What is Missing From the Report'

What WMD?

Where's the Apology?
Mr. Kay still claims that this was a pure intelligence failure. I don't buy it: the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has issued a damning report on how the threat from Iraq was hyped, and former officials warned of politicized intelligence during the war buildup.

Poles criticize their leader after he meets with Bush

Iraq attacks to rise - US general

Bush refuses to call inquiry into WMD

Kay-O'd on Iraqi Weapons?

Bush evades

The unjust world order
Repeated time and again, propaganda becomes plausible and, ultimately, "facts", at least for some people, for some time. At such a time, one must remember the proverbial story of the emperor’s clothes. In addition, one must deconstruct the propaganda machinery through recourse to certain basic, indisputable facts.

Bush, Blair, and WMD intelligence



Printer friendly version
Send page by E-Mail

Previous »  9/11 Attack »  Israel-Palestine »  US/Iraq »   

Search WWW Search www.uscrusade.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.