What can we believe? Bush and Blair are lying Posted: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Car bomb kills 50 near Baghdad Bush cried 'wolf' on Iraq's threat
Intelligence panel lacks independence The creation of a special commission to look into the prewar assessment of Iraq's weapons capabilities falls woefully short of what the public deserves to know about the Bush administration's decision to go to war.
Calling Maj. Ritter Ritter redux, revisited Flashback Scott Ritter in His Own Words Flashback The search for Iraqi WMD has become a public joke
Blair raised 'false expectations' Tony Blair undermined the global fight against weapons proliferation by raising "false expectations" about Iraq's arsenal and by marginalising intelligence experts, Brian Jones, the key witness of the Hutton inquiry, has warned.
Bush's fuzzy thinking
Send the truth squad to the White House
Bush Doctrine, not evidence of weapons, led to war Why Iraq? The neoconservatives -- Wolfowitz, Perle & Co. -- we know, had been plotting war on Iraq and propagandizing for a U.S. invasion for years. But why did Bush sign on? Why did he make Iraq the first target of his doctrine? There was no tie between Saddam and 9-11, and Iraq seemed neither a grave nor an imminent threat.
Printer friendly version Send page by E-Mail
|