Iraq weapons search turns up zilch
Posted: Friday, October 3, 2003
The disarming facts
In sum, Saddam Hussein's regime did not possess useable biological, chemical or nuclear weapons when the war was launched. Iraq could not therefore accurately be said to pose a current or serious or imminent hreat to its neighbours and the west, at least in terms of WMD, as the US and Britain claimed.
Iraq had not produced chemical or biological weapons
since before 1991 Gulf War
1,200 weapons inspectors spent 90 days in Iraq.
The exercise cost $300m.
And the number of weapons found? 0
Iraq weapons search turns up zilch: CIA
Weapons search black hole deepens
More Questions Surface About Bush's WMD Claims
No Illicit Arms Found in Iraq, U.S. Inspector Tells Congress
'No surprise' Iraq WMD not found
'There are no shining weapons'
'We found nothing, despite Saddam's ambitions'
No weapons found in Iraq, report says
Text of Iraq weapons inspector David Kay's report
Lack of hard evidence dismays both sides in Congress
Report underlines scale of intelligence failure
Weapons inspectors need more time, Blair insists
Still no WMD, but Straw says war was justified
Why the Bush Doctrine is dead
Judge rules out death sentence and
terror evidence in Moussaoui case
Annan challenges US over Iraq
Annan Raises Doubts About Quick Self-Rule for Iraq
Kofi Annan a "cheeky darkie"
North Korea boasts of growing plutonium stock
 Printer friendly version
 Send page by E-Mail
|