Mossad ‘hit-team’ strikes again?
Posted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005

Israel and/or America Implicated in Killing of Rafik Harriri
We must do as they do in other criminal cases, look at who had the most to gain from the assassination of Prime Minister Harriri. The Lebanese had a lot to lose, as did the Syrians (he was close to Bashir Al Assad, the leader of Syria), as did the other Arab countries in the region who saw him as a strong leader and a stabilizing force in Lebanese politics. On the other hand, Israel has wanted chaos in Lebanon, as has America, and both countries have been agitating to get Hezbollah outlawed and both America and Israel have wanted the Lebanese to oust Syria. In both cases, the Lebanese government has said, "NO," that Hezbollah is a respected part of Lebanese life and that Syria is there to protect Lebanon from Israeli aggression.

No matter where else you look, no one else had anything to gain except Israel and the U.S. because this death could cause some possible upset in Lebanese politics and life.

Mossad ‘hit-team’ strikes again
A car bomb took the life of Lebanon 's former prime
minister Rafik Al-Hariri today. It would not be the first
time that Israel has, directly or indirectly, has targeted
Arab leaders to keep its neighbouring countries in turmoil.

Israel To Carry Out Assassinations In Other Countries
Israel is embarking upon a more aggressive approach to the war on terror that will include staging targeted killings in the United States and other friendly countries, former Israeli intelligence officials told United Press International.

Late Hariri`sconsultant: Hariri`s assassination by Mossad aimed

"CNN's Nuke Plant Photos Identical for Both Iran and N. Korea!"
Two stories posted in the last week on the CNN website, one on nukes in Iran last Wednesday, and another on nukes in North Korea on Saturday, both use the same aerial photograph of the same purported nuclear power plant!
But one is supposed to be in Iran and the other is supposed to be in North Korea!

We Need the Oil, Right? So What's the Problem?
Canadian writer Linda McQuaig, author of "It's the Crude, Dude", has noted that decades from now it will all seem a no-brainer. Historians will calmly discuss the war in Iraq and identify oil as one of the key factors in the decision to launch it. They will point to growing US dependence on foreign oil, the competition with China, India, and others for a world oil supply with terminal illness, and the fact that (as Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz has put it) Iraq "swims on a sea of oil." It will all seem so obvious as to provoke little more than a yawn.

‘Iran has no nukes’

It Takes One Bully to Read the Mind of Another
There is a chicken and egg problem here, that is, a question of which came first, China’s wicked plans to destroy us, or our (wicked) plan to control world oil and destroy any and all that get in our way



Printer friendly version
Send page by E-Mail

Previous »  9/11 Attack »  Israel-Palestine »  US/Iraq »   

Search WWW Search www.uscrusade.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.